Ched Evans

I dont know why it bothers people so much that someone's mentioned Hurst, just scroll past it if you don't want to read it

If Evans had had Hurst as his lawyer he'd have walked (cos he's good at defence!!!!!!!!11111)

Quoted from Mariner93er

I dont know why it bothers people so much that someone's mentioned Hurst, just scroll past it if you don't want to read it

Because it shouldn't be too much to expect that when opening a thread that the posts contained within it should relate to the topic in the title. It's not as if there are aren't countless threads where the posts could fit quite well.

Quoted from LH

Amazing. A new record for turning a thread into an anti-Hurst one.

Think it was tongue in cheek to be fair.  

A national paper said today that referring this case straight to the Court of Appeal was very unusual. Onlly about 1 case in 33 is referred there direct. The new evidence seems to be very compelling.

The article also said that a "defence" website had reported that the alleged victim had (allegedly) a new pink mini and had had at least one foreign holiday.   The paper said that this article has since been removed.  

People can draw their own conclusions from the above.

Quoted from grimsby pete

Ok as Hurst's defence council,

You start with his defence , why are we drawing so many games,

Why does he urine strikers off by dropping them even though they have been doing their job,

[/b]Why does he keep playing a loan player who has failed to score,[b]

Have you noticed how many goals Cook has scored last season and this for Barrow ?

With the right encouragement he could have been a decent player for us,

Need I go on ?

See you at Braintree mate.

When you sign a player on loan, the club loaning the player are paying a large percentage of the players wages in return for match time. In a lot of cases there are clauses that the player has to play X amount of minutes while on loan.
That's why it's a gamble bringing a player in on loan when you have already performing, just to cover for injuries, as you have to play them.

I'm guessing the x in Patrick Bamford's (for example) contract is 1.

Quoted from The Yard Dog

When you sign a player on loan, the club loaning the player are paying a large percentage of the players wages in return for match time. In a lot of cases there are clauses that the player has to play X amount of minutes while on loan.
That's why it's a gamble bringing a player in on loan when you have already performing, just to cover for injuries, as you have to play them.

Yes I think that must be the case.

Probally get let off, then loads of League 1/2 clubs will be after him, which is a pity really, because as it stands I don't think there would be any better place for him to start than in the non-league.

Swoop while the iron is hot, months training with the club boom! One Championship / League 1 top striker in the bag - 18 month contract, with a release clause of 500K if a club bids for him - best for both parties.

See you all in League 2 next year.

Quoted from grimsby pete

Ok as Hurst's defence council,

You start with his defence , why are we drawing so many games,

Why does he urine strikers off by dropping them even though they have been doing their job,

Why does he keep playing a loan player who has failed to score,

Have you noticed how many goals Cook has scored last season and this for Barrow ?

With the right encouragement he could have been a decent player for us,

Need I go on ?

See you at Braintree mate.

You're really bringing Andy Cook into this!? He was fat and lazy in his second season here. His own fault, no one elses, Add to that he was bloody useless when they played us at BP earlier this season!