Print Topic - Archive

Fishy Forum  /  Archive  /  
Posted by: 137 (Guest), April 22, 2014, 3:29pm
The idea of synchronicity is that the conceptual relationship of minds, defined as the relationship between ideas, is intricately structured in its own poetically logical way and gives rise to relationships that are not causal in nature. These relationships can manifest themselves as occurrences that are meaningfully related.

Synchronistic events reveal an underlying pattern, a conceptual framework that encompasses, but is larger than, any of the systems that display the synchronicity. The suggestion of a larger framework is essential to satisfy the definition of synchronicity as originally developed by Carl Gustav Jung.

Jung coined the word to describe what he called "temporally coincident occurrences of acausal events." Jung variously described synchronicity as an "acausal connecting (togetherness) principle", "meaningful coincidence" and "acausal parallelism".

It was a principle that Jung felt gave conclusive evidence for his concepts of archetypes and the collective unconscious, in that it was descriptive of a governing dynamic that underlies the whole of human experience and history – social, emotional, psychological, and spiritual. Concurrent events that first appear to be coincidental but later turn out to be causally related are termed incoincident.

Jung believed that many experiences that are coincidences due to chance in terms of causality suggested the manifestation of parallel events or circumstances in terms of meaning, reflecting this governing dynamic.
            ************************************************************************

In other words: we came down with Luton - and we'll go back up with Luton.   ::)


Posted by: Rodley Mariner, April 22, 2014, 3:43pm; Reply: 1
Didn't Luton come down a year before us?

So are you saying we're doomed for another year or we're going under like Darlo? Nice positivity chiangmaimariner!  ;)
Posted by: N2K, April 22, 2014, 3:45pm; Reply: 2
Quoted from 137
The idea of synchronicity is that the conceptual relationship of minds, defined as the relationship between ideas, is intricately structured in its own poetically logical way and gives rise to relationships that are not causal in nature. These relationships can manifest themselves as occurrences that are meaningfully related.

Synchronistic events reveal an underlying pattern, a conceptual framework that encompasses, but is larger than, any of the systems that display the synchronicity. The suggestion of a larger framework is essential to satisfy the definition of synchronicity as originally developed by Carl Gustav Jung.

Jung coined the word to describe what he called "temporally coincident occurrences of acausal events." Jung variously described synchronicity as an "acausal connecting (togetherness) principle", "meaningful coincidence" and "acausal parallelism".

It was a principle that Jung felt gave conclusive evidence for his concepts of archetypes and the collective unconscious, in that it was descriptive of a governing dynamic that underlies the whole of human experience and history – social, emotional, psychological, and spiritual. Concurrent events that first appear to be coincidental but later turn out to be causally related are termed incoincident.

Jung believed that many experiences that are coincidences due to chance in terms of causality suggested the manifestation of parallel events or circumstances in terms of meaning, reflecting this governing dynamic.
            ************************************************************************

In other words: we came down with Luton - and we'll go back up with Luton.   ::)




pointless post, as we came down with Darlington.
Posted by: 137 (Guest), April 22, 2014, 3:49pm; Reply: 3
Quoted from N2K


pointless post, as we came down with Darlington.


What can I say...old age...failing memory....OOPS!
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, April 22, 2014, 3:50pm; Reply: 4
Quoted from 137


What can I say...old age...failing memory....OOPS!


I enjoyed the sentiment and it definitely made a change from Cook vs LJL!
Posted by: Abdul19, April 22, 2014, 3:58pm; Reply: 5
The commentator on Friday said we'd come down with Luton too, although he also referred to our big numero 14 as John Lennell-Lewis ;)
Posted by: GrimRob, April 22, 2014, 4:37pm; Reply: 6
We should have gone down instead of Luton, their points deduction saved us.
Posted by: Abdul19, April 22, 2014, 4:45pm; Reply: 7
They shouldn't have cheated.
Posted by: barralad, April 22, 2014, 6:30pm; Reply: 8
Carl Jung on the Fishy...Whatever next?

Maybe some Logical Positivism called for before the end of the month?
Posted by: 3610 (Guest), April 22, 2014, 6:38pm; Reply: 9
Quoted from barralad
Carl Jung on the Fishy...Whatever next?

Maybe some Logical Positivism called for before the end of the month?


It's usually more George Jung than Carl Jung!

Great effort on original post though!
Posted by: LongEatonMariner, April 22, 2014, 7:37pm; Reply: 10
Quoted from 137


What can I say...old age...failing memory....OOPS!


Nice try though!
Posted by: moosey_club, April 22, 2014, 8:59pm; Reply: 11
Quoted from 137
The idea of synchronicity is that the conceptual relationship of minds, defined as the relationship between ideas, is intricately structured in its own poetically logical way and gives rise to relationships that are not causal in nature. These relationships can manifest themselves as occurrences that are meaningfully related.

Synchronistic events reveal an underlying pattern, a conceptual framework that encompasses, but is larger than, any of the systems that display the synchronicity. The suggestion of a larger framework is essential to satisfy the definition of synchronicity as originally developed by Carl Gustav Jung.

Jung coined the word to describe what he called "temporally coincident occurrences of acausal events." Jung variously described synchronicity as an "acausal connecting (togetherness) principle", "meaningful coincidence" and "acausal parallelism".

It was a principle that Jung felt gave conclusive evidence for his concepts of archetypes and the collective unconscious, in that it was descriptive of a governing dynamic that underlies the whole of human experience and history – social, emotional, psychological, and spiritual. Concurrent events that first appear to be coincidental but later turn out to be causally related are termed incoincident.

Jung believed that many experiences that are coincidences due to chance in terms of causality suggested the manifestation of parallel events or circumstances in terms of meaning, reflecting this governing dynamic.
            ************************************************************************

In other words: we came down with Luton - and we'll go back up with Luton.   ::)




A beautifully put, well analysed and educated post from an obviously well read poster.....who unfortunately knows little about our recent history. haha  :P
Posted by: Stevie Saunders, April 22, 2014, 9:52pm; Reply: 12
Next week: Vygotsky's constructivism theory and how Andy Cook could become a more rounded centre forward.
Constructivism is a new approach in education that claims humans are better able to understand the information they have constructed by themselves. According to constructivist theories, learning is a social advancement that involves language, real world situations, and interaction and collaboration among learners. The learners are considered to be central in the learning process. Learning is affected by our prejudices, experiences, the time in which we live, and both physical and mental maturity. When motivated, the learner exercises his will, determination, and action to gather selective information, convert it, formulate hypotheses, test these suppositions via applications, interactions or experiences, and to draw verifiable conclusions. Constructivism transforms today’s classrooms into a knowledge-construction site where information is absorbed and knowledge is built by the learner.

But before we proceed, it's worth noting:
"Unlike Piaget's notion that children's' development must necessarily precede their learning, Vygotsky argued, "learning is a necessary and universal aspect of the process of developing culturally organized, specifically human psychological function".  In other words, social learning tends to precede (i.e. come before) development.

Does anyone agree with me that Hurst could try this with Andy?
Posted by: Teesknees, April 22, 2014, 10:52pm; Reply: 13
So who did come down with Luton?
Posted by: N2K, April 22, 2014, 10:57pm; Reply: 14
Quoted from Teesknees
So who did come down with Luton?


chester I think, not sure
Posted by: ginnywings, April 22, 2014, 11:13pm; Reply: 15
I think us and Luton are the only two teams to play in all 5 top divisions, so we should go up with them if we want synchronisity.
Posted by: StiggsGTFC, April 22, 2014, 11:16pm; Reply: 16
Quoted from ginnywings
I think us and Luton are the only two teams to play in all 5 top divisions, so we should go up with them if we want synchronisity.


Wimbledon?

Posted by: Southwark Mariner, April 22, 2014, 11:35pm; Reply: 17
so where do I get Jung's fish pies?
Posted by: ginnywings, April 22, 2014, 11:37pm; Reply: 18
Quoted from StiggsGTFC


Wimbledon?



Wimbledon FC.

AFC Wimbledon.

Not the same team.
Posted by: Trawler, April 23, 2014, 9:14am; Reply: 19
Quoted from Southwark Mariner
so where do I get Jung's fish pies?


Classic Fishy post.
Posted by: tashee69, April 23, 2014, 10:00am; Reply: 20
Quoted from Southwark Mariner
so where do I get Jung's fish pies?


At the Jungs fish pie shop !!
Posted by: TownSNAFU5, April 23, 2014, 10:41am; Reply: 21
Northampton may be added to the list next week.  
Posted by: Barrattstander, April 23, 2014, 12:04pm; Reply: 22
The Conference was formed in 1979 the only four teams to have played in the top 5 divisions are:
Carlisle United
Grimsby Town
Luton Town
Oxford United
Print page generated: April 29, 2024, 10:26am