|Spanish La Liga|
|Celta de Vigo v Deportivo de La Coruna|
|Italian Serie A|
|Udinese v Pescara|
|N.E.C. v Vitesse Arnhem|
|St Johnstone v Dundee|
|AC Horsens v Randers Freja|
|Swiss Super League|
|Young Boys v Grasshoppers|
|HJK Helsinki v SJK|
|IFK Mariehamn v Ilves|
|KuPS Kuopio v PS Kemi|
|PK35 v Inter Turku|
|RoPS Rovaniemi v HIFK Helsinki|
|VPS Vaasa v Lahti|
|Man City v Southampton|
|Belgian Pro League|
|Club Brugge v Anderlecht|
|FC Groningen v AZ Alkmaar|
Question of the Week
Will Paul Hurst stay at Grimsby?
Prudent Management or Plain Lunacy?
By: Graham Howes
EVERY year we have same problem around this period. A number of players have contracts that run out at the end of the current campaign. The board have indicated they cannot negotiate due to the fact we do not know what division we will be playing in.
However is this prudent management or plain lunacy? I will explain. I believe one player who is due is Alan Pouton - if not let's use him as an example. [Ed - he has actually signed a new contract]. On today's current market he is worth £750K. If he does not start negotiations he is free to approach other clubs. Come near transfer deadline there may be every indication that he may sign for someone else on a Bosman. The club then will have to start listening to offers around £200K. You may think this is pie in the sky yet this very thing happened with Jack Lester a few seasons ago. We also lost Peter Handyside to a Bosman last season. We must have lost financially a combined £500-600K in revenue from the Lester and Handyside fiasco. We also could lose another £500K on Pouton, effectively 1 million pounds loss to a club like Grimsby is suicide.
Let's assume he is on £3K a week, he costs the club £156K a year in wages. What you can do is get the player to sign for two more years. If the worst happens he can then be made available. You have a safety net so that any prospective buyers want him they pay full market value. It may take a month or so for him to be sold, but you still will make a profit return compared to the other solution of Bosmans or a cheap sale. Admittedly you do not do this with every squad member due. It is no good doing this with a player whose value is less than £150K.
So I pose the question again is it prudent management or plain lunacy to play the waiting game when contracts are up in the summer? In my opinion if the player is an asset in value to the club it is plain lunacy. We currently losing money, so any decision that costs the club much needed finances is a wrong move. You may save £50K in wages in the short term and get a £200K sale. Yet holding on a little while could net £600-700K. Even if you consider a £100K signing-on sweetener you still are better off trying to get the player tied up.
If you have a rant or two and you would also like the opportunity to air your views and opinions, Click here to submit them!
This site is by the fans, for the fans, and we will consider articles on any subject relating to the Mariners whether it be related to current news, a nostalgic look back in the past, a story about a player, a game or games in the past, something about Blundell Park or football in general. Click here to submit your article!
- Grimsby Town Announce Two Players Released
- Groves - Time To Decide: Player Or Manager?
- Boro Defender Trial
- More Stories
|Change/add-a-letter/remove-one Word Game thread...||23,917||Biccys||23/10 10:30|
|Word Association Game||36,362||topuphere666||23/10 10:29|
|Twat of the Week||41||Wrawby_Mariner||23/10 10:25|
|Operation keep hursty||58||Superdan147||23/10 10:23|
|Doig says no contact made||126||dapperz fun pub||23/10 10:18|
|Loan strikers||12||BartonianMariner||23/10 10:01|
|The Icenian Predicition League - WEEK 12||404||Les Brechin||23/10 10:01|
|Idiot town fan on Sherews forum||16||Hagrid||23/10 09:58|
|Just back.||63||ginnywings||23/10 09:32|
|Long serving managers||9||forza ivano||23/10 09:16|
News | Features | Submit Article | |