The Fishy.co.uk Grimsby Town FC

RSS



League Two Table

  PGDPts
1Luton142230
2Notts County14929
3Exeter14629

4Wycombe14726
5Accrington Stanley14626
6Newport County14824
7Stevenage14124

8Coventry14623
9Lincoln City14323
10Swindon14222
11Grimsby14-221
12Mansfield14120
13Cambridge Utd14-120
14Colchester14018
15Carlisle14-118
16Cheltenham14-117
17Crewe14-517
18Yeovil14-815
19Crawley Town14-414
20Barnet14-213
21Morecambe14-813
22Port Vale14-511

23Forest Green14-199
24Chesterfield14-158

Full League Two Table
Prem|Champ|L1|NL|VN|VS
SPL|SC|S1|S2



Question of the Week

What is more important, result or style of football?

Result
Style of Football


 

League Slammed Over Rule Change Proposal

By: Bill Osborne
Date: 26/04/2003

R3, The trade body representing the business recovery specialists who pick up the pieces when football clubs get into financial difficulty today slammed football league proposals.

The proposals, announced yesterday, mean any club entering into an insolvency procedure could be docked points or possibly even relegated, possibly leading to the loss of some of the UK's most historic clubs.

R3, the Association of Business Recovery Professionals believes the football league has missed the point completely. Following Leicester City's promotion after administration this season, the league seems to be of the view that a club enters into an insolvency procedure to renege on their debts and gain an advantage over its rivals.

An R3 spokesperson said "This over simplifies the true commercial risks facing football clubs - the plain fact of the matter is that financially stricken clubs are forced into administration due to their legal duty to creditors and to avoid prosecution of the directors for knowingly trading while insolvent.

The bottom line is that for many clubs administration is the last resort, not a way of duping the people they owe money to.

What these proposed sanctions are more likely to do is encourage many clubs to trade for longer while insolvent due to a fear of lost points or relegation, and in the long term, as the debts pile up, the main loser will be the creditors who will get paid less as there will be less to go round as losses continue to mount. Stoking up a fear of insolvency is not the answer.

Furthermore, sanctions imposed by the league are likely to damage a club's season. Revenues will go down as fans desert, players will be less motivated and consequently, a competitive advantage will be handed to those clubs who have yet to be played.

The problem lies with inflated wages. A club's biggest overhead is its players' wages. In 2001, these accounted for 105% of the total revenue of the First division alone, and this was before the collapse of ITV Digital which cost each division club £2.5million.

The football league should take action to release clubs form the restrictive super creditor rule which puts a club's players at the top of the pile in terms of who gets paid first in insolvency. It also states that if a club does not pay its players the full amount they are owed in wages then that club faces expulsion from the league.

However, if clubs were able to negotiate with players and alter the amount they were paid according to income levels in order to shake off overheads, reduce arrears and pay creditors, then insolvency would be far less likely. This is what a business recovery specialist would seek to do in any other industry as a mechanism of saving the business. With football clubs, the super-creditor rule prevents them from doing this. R3 believes the answer lies in its abolition.

If sanctions are to be imposed, then they should come at an earlier stage. If clubs do not pay their PAYE consecutively for two months, then they could be docked a point. This would encourage better cash flow management at an earlier stage, not after the final nail has been put into the coffin.

R3 believes these proposals to be bad news for everyday creditors who will get paid less as clubs delay entering into an insolvency procedure, bad news for the clubs themselves because a relegated club is unlikely to attract potentially lifesaving investment and finally bad news for players, as it will inevitably lead to salaries being slashed when they are up for renewal. In short, a measure that is meant to be preventative could lead to the loss of many historic football league clubs."END




Add To Facebook


This site is by the fans, for the fans, and we will consider articles on any subject relating to the Mariners whether it be related to current news, a nostalgic look back in the past, a story about a player, a game or games in the past, something about Blundell Park or football in general. Click here to submit your article!


Related Stories

Forum Latest
TitlePostsLatest Post
Just Back-on the bus.26barralad18/10 02:37
Cheltenham Match thread215Sussexmariner18/10 01:17
Reece Hall-Johnson49The Grim Reaper18/10 00:56
The Slade effect7gtfc9818/10 00:48
Fanzones10gtfc9818/10 00:38
Ex-GTFC players thread2,168Tommy17/10 23:49
Cheltenham (A) Predictions34promotion plaice17/10 22:39
Change/add-a-letter/remove-one Word Game thread...29,596Biccys17/10 22:13
Word Association Game42,999topuphere66617/10 22:10
Dembele31TAGG17/10 22:08

News  | Features  | Submit Article  |   | 
© 2017 TheFishy.co.uk