The Fishy.co.uk Grimsby Town FC

RSS



League Two Form Guide

  PGDPts
1Lincoln City6414
2Colchester6812
3Newport County6-212
4Luton6511
5Wycombe6311
6Exeter6310
7Grimsby6210
8Accrington Stanley6110
9Cambridge Utd639
10Forest Green629
11Carlisle619
12Mansfield608
13Cheltenham6-68
14Crewe617
15Notts County6-27
16Coventry6-47
17Barnet6-36
18Morecambe6-36
19Swindon6-45
20Yeovil6-44
21Chesterfield6-74
22Port Vale6-74
23Crawley Town6-43
24Stevenage6-92

Full Form Table
Prem|Champ|L1|NL|VN|VS
SPL|SC|S1|S2

Latest Results (all divisions)



Question of the Week

Is the squad strong enough to challenge for promotion?

Strong yes
Weak yes
Neutral
Weak no
Strong no


His Honour
His Honour

Don't Hold Your Breath Waiting For The Cash!

By: Bill Osborne
Date: 13/06/2005

IN the club statement regarding the legal action against the Hammonds solicitors group, the club issues a warning that we should not get carried away by the announcement as litigation can go either way.

One can be assured that the legal representatives of the insurance companies of Hammonds will try every trick in the book to defend their clients, as it is the insurance company or companies that will eventually pay out if the League wins.

One of the main issues to be resolved is the question of liability of the contract acceptance.

The defence will plead, according to the advice I have been given that: "The solicitors only offered advice and it was up to the League to either accept or not the advice given. The League decided to accept the advice and acted upon it. In short, the League signed the contract which was the cause of the financial losses sustained by the clubs due to no guarantees being obtained from the parent companies of ITV Digital. Therefore the League are responsible, not the solicitors."

Now that seems straight enough to me but fortunately or unfortunately, as the case may be, the law is much more complicated than that and it is not as clear cut as it appears.

In any case, we may not see any decision before we pay the outstanding tax bill, so that is another reason we should not get carried away.

I personally have been through the courts in a compensation case and my view is that if during the course of events an out of court settlement is offered, providing the offer is reasonable, the League should accept it rather than risking losing the whole lot.

Better to have half a loaf than none at all.

Mind you, if the case collapses and we get nothing, we can always sue the League for failing to protect us. Didn't one club suggest doing that just after the ITV Digital collapse?

Whatever happens, the Football League has learned a very expensive lesson.

Always read the small print before you sign! Everybody knows that.

Except the Football League perhaps.

Add To Facebook


This site is by the fans, for the fans, and we will consider articles on any subject relating to the Mariners whether it be related to current news, a nostalgic look back in the past, a story about a player, a game or games in the past, something about Blundell Park or football in general. Click here to submit your article!


Related Stories

Forum Latest
TitlePostsLatest Post
Sam Hart30Lincoln Mariner 5621/07 17:51
Word Association Game41,410topuphere66621/07 17:39
Signings (or lack of ) 19jonnyboy8221/07 17:29
Jack Keeble2Oly198721/07 17:12
Another Arry9Black_and_White_Bear21/07 17:00
Change/add-a-letter/remove-one Word Game thread...28,377Biccys21/07 16:31
New Fishy Pontoon Buster Game52Les Brechin21/07 15:39
Boston - Saturday22Youngy21/07 15:38
Josh Venney25Cloudy21/07 15:32
Ex-GTFC players thread2,091Tommy21/07 15:15

News  | Features  | Submit Article  |   | 
© 2017 TheFishy.co.uk