The Fishy.co.uk Grimsby Town FC

RSS



League Two Form Guide

  PGDPts
1Exeter6918
2Notts County6716
3Accrington Stanley6513
4Cambridge Utd6213
5Luton6311
6Lincoln City6310
7Newport County6310
8Stevenage6210
9Mansfield639
10Crewe619
11Swindon6-29
12Grimsby6-39
13Wycombe608
14Barnet627
15Crawley Town617
16Colchester607
17Coventry6-17
18Yeovil6-25
19Morecambe6-35
20Carlisle6-55
21Chesterfield6-65
22Cheltenham6-44
23Forest Green6-84
24Port Vale6-71

Full Form Table
Prem|Champ|L1|NL|VN|VS
SPL|SC|S1|S2

Latest Results (all divisions)



Question of the Week

How happy are you with the GTFC board?

Very happy
Happy
Neutral
Unhappy
Very unhappy


His Honour
His Honour

Don't Hold Your Breath Waiting For The Cash!

By: Bill Osborne
Date: 13/06/2005

IN the club statement regarding the legal action against the Hammonds solicitors group, the club issues a warning that we should not get carried away by the announcement as litigation can go either way.

One can be assured that the legal representatives of the insurance companies of Hammonds will try every trick in the book to defend their clients, as it is the insurance company or companies that will eventually pay out if the League wins.

One of the main issues to be resolved is the question of liability of the contract acceptance.

The defence will plead, according to the advice I have been given that: "The solicitors only offered advice and it was up to the League to either accept or not the advice given. The League decided to accept the advice and acted upon it. In short, the League signed the contract which was the cause of the financial losses sustained by the clubs due to no guarantees being obtained from the parent companies of ITV Digital. Therefore the League are responsible, not the solicitors."

Now that seems straight enough to me but fortunately or unfortunately, as the case may be, the law is much more complicated than that and it is not as clear cut as it appears.

In any case, we may not see any decision before we pay the outstanding tax bill, so that is another reason we should not get carried away.

I personally have been through the courts in a compensation case and my view is that if during the course of events an out of court settlement is offered, providing the offer is reasonable, the League should accept it rather than risking losing the whole lot.

Better to have half a loaf than none at all.

Mind you, if the case collapses and we get nothing, we can always sue the League for failing to protect us. Didn't one club suggest doing that just after the ITV Digital collapse?

Whatever happens, the Football League has learned a very expensive lesson.

Always read the small print before you sign! Everybody knows that.

Except the Football League perhaps.

Add To Facebook


This site is by the fans, for the fans, and we will consider articles on any subject relating to the Mariners whether it be related to current news, a nostalgic look back in the past, a story about a player, a game or games in the past, something about Blundell Park or football in general. Click here to submit your article!


Related Stories

Forum Latest
TitlePostsLatest Post
Notts County Res  v Town Res.8Grimal20/09 00:20
Ex-GTFC players thread2,142Tommy19/09 23:41
Purpose of The Fishy73The Old Codger19/09 23:33
Word Association Game42,501topuphere66619/09 22:04
THE ICENIAN PREDICTION LEAGUE. WEEK 7248Les Brechin19/09 21:33
Change/add-a-letter/remove-one Word Game thread...29,238Biccys19/09 21:16
Marcus Bignot59Les Brechin19/09 21:15
Clements 18zorro_is_a_Mariner19/09 20:22
Holiday's7Jarmo.Is.God19/09 19:48
Be careful what you wish for89Ascend19/09 16:58

News  | Features  | Submit Article  |   | 
© 2017 TheFishy.co.uk