Conference Table
| | | P | GD | Pts |
| 1 | AFC Wimbledon | 7 | +7 | 16 |
| 2 | Crawley Town | 7 | +5 | 14 |
| 3 | Mansfield | 7 | +5 | 13 |
|
| 4 | Grimsby | 7 | +1 | 13 |
| 5 | Tamworth | 7 | +2 | 12 |
| 6 | Luton | 7 | +2 | 11 |
| 7 | Fleetwood Town | 7 | +2 | 11 |
|
| 8 | Southport | 7 | +1 | 11 |
| 9 | Darlington | 7 | +2 | 10 |
| 10 | Rushden & D'mnds | 7 | 0 | 10 |
| 11 | Cambridge Utd | 7 | +5 | 9 |
| 12 | York | 7 | +3 | 9 |
| 13 | Forest Green | 7 | +1 | 9 |
| 14 | Wrexham | 7 | -1 | 9 |
| 15 | Newport County | 7 | +2 | 8 |
| 16 | Eastbourne Boro | 7 | +1 | 8 |
| 17 | Histon | 7 | -3 | 8 |
| 18 | Kidderminster | 7 | -4 | 8 |
| 19 | Gateshead | 7 | -6 | 8 |
| 20 | Barrow | 7 | -2 | 7 |
| 21 | Hayes & Yeading | 7 | -8 | 7 |
| 22 | Kettering | 7 | -1 | 6 |
|
| 23 | Bath City | 7 | -3 | 6 |
| 24 | Altrincham | 7 | -11 | 1 |
More league tables More form tables Latest Scores
|
Question of the Week
Can Grimsby Town ever be financially viable?
League Two Form Guide
| | | P | GD | Pts |
| 1 | Shrewsbury | 6 | 8 | 14 | | 2 | Chesterfield | 6 | 7 | 14 | | 3 | Torquay | 6 | 7 | 13 | | 4 | Burton Albion | 6 | 6 | 11 | | 5 | Port Vale | 6 | 4 | 11 | | 6 | Wycombe | 6 | 5 | 10 | | 7 | Rotherham | 6 | 0 | 10 | | 8 | Oxford | 6 | 5 | 9 | | 9 | Stevenage | 6 | 2 | 9 | | 10 | Bury | 6 | 1 | 9 | | 11 | Accrington Stanley | 6 | 3 | 8 | | 12 | Cheltenham | 6 | -2 | 8 | | 13 | Barnet | 6 | -5 | 8 | | 14 | Aldershot | 6 | 0 | 7 | | 15 | Southend | 6 | -2 | 7 | | 16 | Hereford | 6 | -4 | 7 | | 17 | Bradford | 6 | -6 | 6 | | 18 | Crewe | 6 | 4 | 5 | | 19 | Lincoln | 6 | -3 | 5 | | 20 | Northampton | 6 | -3 | 5 | | 21 | Morecambe | 6 | -6 | 5 | | 22 | Stockport | 6 | -7 | 5 | | 23 | Gillingham | 6 | -5 | 3 | | 24 | Macclesfield | 6 | -6 | 3 |
More form tables
More league tables
Latest Scores
|