The Fishy - Grimsby Town FC

at flag

Austria Bundesliga Form Table

Austria Bundesliga Form (Last 6)
Pos Team P W D L F A GD PtsBTTS G15 km15
1LASK Linz6510174+1316420
2Wolfsberger AC641184+413120
3Sturm Graz6240106+410521620
4Grazer AK6213108+2722164
5Salzburg62139907500
6SV Ried621356-1722266
7TSV Hartberg62131013-37420
8Austria Vienna6213610-47330
9SCR Altach6132711-46310
10WSG Tirol613249-56200
11Rapid Vienna6114411-74230
12Austria Lustenau00000000010
Austria Bundesliga Form (Last 10)
Pos Team P W D L F A GD PtsBTTS G15 km15
1LASK Linz107212712+1523820
2Sturm Graz10460189+918721620
3Wolfsberger AC104331010015320
4Grazer AK104241812+61452164
5SV Ried10424121201452266
6SCR Altach103431416-213610
7Salzburg103251415-111800
8Rapid Vienna103251016-611430
9Austria Vienna103251120-911630
10TSV Hartberg102351116-59520
11WSG Tirol10235922-139500
12Austria Lustenau00000000010

xPts is shown for both the 6 games and last 10 games.
For column heading definitions, see the Key at the bottom of the table.

Austria Bundesliga (Expected Points)
PosTeamP6PtsxPtsPts v xPts P10PtsxPtsPts v xPts
1LASK Linz616 1023 
2Wolfsberger AC613 1015 
3Sturm Graz610 1018 
4Grazer AK67 1014 
5Salzburg67 1011 
6SV Ried67 1014 
7TSV Hartberg67 109 
8Austria Vienna67 1011 
9SCR Altach66 1013 
10WSG Tirol66 109 
11Rapid Vienna64 1011 
12Austria Lustenau00 00 
Key to column names
  • P6/P10 - First column showing results grouped into either last 6 or last 10 games
  • Pts - Actual points earned during the last 6 or 10 games
  • xPts - Expected points from those games, based on aggregated xG (expected goals) for and against
  • Pts v xPts - Comparison of actual versus expected points (positive = over-performance; negative = under-performance)

For column heading definitions, see the Key at the bottom of the table.

Goals scored and conceded (Last 10)
Pos Team FAGDMG BTTS SF CF CS TF
1LASK Linz271215398/10 (80%)8/10 (80%)2/10 (20%)2/10 (20%)18
2Sturm Graz1899277/10 (70%)4/10 (40%)5/10 (50%)3/10 (30%)30
3Wolfsberger AC10100203/10 (30%)4/10 (40%)4/10 (40%)5/10 (50%)28
4Grazer AK18126305/10 (50%)4/10 (40%)6/10 (60%)2/10 (20%)38
5SV Ried12120245/10 (50%)4/10 (40%)5/10 (50%)2/10 (20%)34
6SCR Altach1416-2306/10 (60%)8/10 (80%)1/10 (10%)3/10 (30%)38
7Salzburg1415-1298/10 (80%)4/10 (40%)6/10 (60%)0/10 (0%)32
8Rapid Vienna1016-6264/10 (40%)4/10 (40%)6/10 (60%)2/10 (20%)38
9Austria Vienna1120-9316/10 (60%)6/10 (60%)4/10 (40%)3/10 (30%)27
10TSV Hartberg1116-5275/10 (50%)3/10 (30%)5/10 (50%)3/10 (30%)30
11WSG Tirol922-13315/10 (50%)3/10 (30%)6/10 (60%)2/10 (20%)24
12Austria Lustenau00000/0 (0%)0/0 (0%)0/0 (0%)0/0 (0%) 
Key to column names
  • F - Goals "for" (scored)
  • A - Goals "against" (conceded)
  • GD - Goal difference (F - A)
  • MG - Match goals (F + A)

  • BTTS - Both Teams to Score (number of games, max 10)
  • SF - Team to Score First (number of games, max 10)
  • CF - Team to Concede First (number of games, max 10)

  • CS - Clean Sheets (number of games, max 10)
  • TF - Mean Time of First Goal (in minutes, by either side)

For column heading definitions, see the Key at the bottom of the table.

Numbers of Players (Last 10)
Pos TeamPts SP Pl SPG PM SM
1LASK Linz2318293.6819
2Sturm Graz1819264.57218
3Wolfsberger AC1520244.46921
4Grazer AK1422324.07317
5SV Ried1422264.06330
6SCR Altach1316243.77913
7Salzburg1120274.17415
8Rapid Vienna1117264.47120
9Austria Vienna1116284.47221
10TSV Hartberg922294.77615
11WSG Tirol917243.76822
12Austria Lustenau0     
Key to column names
  • Pts - Team points
  • SP - Total number of starting players used over last 10 games
  • Pl - Total number of players (starting + substitutes) used over last 10 games
  • SPG - Mean number of substitutes per game
  • PM - Median number of minutes played for substituted players
  • SM - Median number of minutes played for substitutes
Distance travelled in 15 days (Km)
PosTeam km miles
1Sturm Graz16201007
2SV Ried266165
3Grazer AK164102
4Austria Lustenau00
5Austria Vienna00
6LASK Linz00
7Rapid Vienna00
8Salzburg00
9SCR Altach00
10TSV Hartberg00
11Wolfsberger AC00
12WSG Tirol00

The ELO rating for each team shows its relative strength based on past match results, adjusting dynamically after each game. A value for k of 50 has been used, meaning ratings change more significantly, making them more responsive to recent performance.

Team ELO Ratings
PosTeamELO Rating
ELO ratings are not available for this league

League Table for this division