The Fishy - Grimsby Town FC

ir flag

Persian Gulf Pro League Form Table

Persian Gulf Pro League Form (Last 10)
Pos Team P W D L F A GD PtsBTTS G15 km15
1Tractor Sazi10631145+921400
2Foolad FC10541169+719600
3Gol Gohar106131412+219500
4Esteghlal FC10532107+318400
5Chadormalu SC10523146+817300
6Fajr Sepasi105051412+215600
7Sepahan FC1043397+215400
8Persepolis FC105051012-215500
9Esteghlal Khuzestan1033479-212300
10Malavan10334612-612200
11Shams Azar Qazvin1025356-111100
12Kheybar Khorramabad102441013-310600
13Paykan1024458-310200
14ZOB Ahan1015438-58200
15Mes Rafsanjan10226512-78200
16Aluminium Arak10145610-47400

xPts is shown for both the 6 games and last 10 games.
For column heading definitions, see the Key at the bottom of the table.

Persian Gulf Pro League (Expected Points)
PosTeamP6PtsxPtsPts v xPts P10PtsxPtsPts v xPts
1Foolad FC614 1019 
2Tractor Sazi613 1021 
3Esteghlal FC613 1018 
4Chadormalu SC610 1017 
5Fajr Sepasi69 1015 
6Sepahan FC68 1015 
7Malavan68 1012 
8Esteghlal Khuzestan68 1012 
9Aluminium Arak67 107 
10Shams Azar Qazvin67 1011 
11Kheybar Khorramabad67 1010 
12Gol Gohar67 1019 
13Persepolis FC66 1015 
14ZOB Ahan65 108 
15Paykan65 1010 
16Mes Rafsanjan64 108 
Key to column names
  • P6/P10 - First column showing results grouped into either last 6 or last 10 games
  • Pts - Actual points earned during the last 6 or 10 games
  • xPts - Expected points from those games, based on aggregated xG (expected goals) for and against
  • Pts v xPts - Comparison of actual versus expected points (positive = over-performance; negative = under-performance)

For column heading definitions, see the Key at the bottom of the table.

Goals scored and conceded (Last 10)
Pos Team FAGDMG BTTS SF CF CS TF
1Tractor Sazi1459194/10 (40%)5/10 (50%)3/10 (30%)6/10 (60%)45
2Foolad FC1697256/10 (60%)5/10 (50%)3/10 (30%)3/10 (30%)32
3Gol Gohar14122265/10 (50%)9/10 (90%)1/10 (10%)4/10 (40%)30
4Esteghlal FC1073174/10 (40%)6/10 (60%)2/10 (20%)4/10 (40%)32
5Chadormalu SC1468203/10 (30%)4/10 (40%)4/10 (40%)4/10 (40%)43
6Fajr Sepasi14122266/10 (60%)4/10 (40%)6/10 (60%)2/10 (20%)44
7Sepahan FC972164/10 (40%)3/10 (30%)5/10 (50%)5/10 (50%)34
8Persepolis FC1012-2225/10 (50%)5/10 (50%)5/10 (50%)4/10 (40%)27
9Esteghlal Khuzestan79-2163/10 (30%)4/10 (40%)4/10 (40%)5/10 (50%)34
10Malavan612-6182/10 (20%)4/10 (40%)5/10 (50%)4/10 (40%)56
11Shams Azar Qazvin56-1111/10 (10%)2/10 (20%)3/10 (30%)7/10 (70%)54
12Kheybar Khorramabad1013-3236/10 (60%)6/10 (60%)3/10 (30%)2/10 (20%)33
13Paykan58-3132/10 (20%)  5/10 (50%)35
14ZOB Ahan38-5112/10 (20%)  5/10 (50%)46
15Mes Rafsanjan512-7172/10 (20%)1/10 (10%)7/10 (70%)3/10 (30%)30
16Aluminium Arak610-4164/10 (40%)2/10 (20%)7/10 (70%)2/10 (20%)44
Key to column names
  • F - Goals "for" (scored)
  • A - Goals "against" (conceded)
  • GD - Goal difference (F - A)
  • MG - Match goals (F + A)

  • BTTS - Both Teams to Score (number of games, max 10)
  • SF - Team to Score First (number of games, max 10)
  • CF - Team to Concede First (number of games, max 10)

  • CS - Clean Sheets (number of games, max 10)
  • TF - Mean Time of First Goal (in minutes, by either side)

For column heading definitions, see the Key at the bottom of the table.

Numbers of Players (Last 10)
Pos TeamPts SP Pl
1Tractor Sazi211724
2Foolad FC191831
3Gol Gohar192439
4Esteghlal FC182131
5Chadormalu SC172230
6Fajr Sepasi151726
7Sepahan FC151832
8Persepolis FC152135
9Esteghlal Khuzestan121932
10Malavan121932
11Shams Azar Qazvin111627
12Kheybar Khorramabad102128
13Paykan102436
14ZOB Ahan82135
15Mes Rafsanjan82438
16Aluminium Arak71836
Key to column names
  • Pts - Team points
  • SP - Total number of starting players used over last 10 games
  • Pl - Total number of players (starting + substitutes) used over last 10 games
  • SPG - Mean number of substitutes per game
  • PM - Median number of minutes played for substituted players
  • SM - Median number of minutes played for substitutes

The ELO rating for each team shows its relative strength based on past match results, adjusting dynamically after each game. A value for k of 50 has been used, meaning ratings change more significantly, making them more responsive to recent performance.

Team ELO Ratings
PosTeamELO Rating
ELO ratings are not available for this league

League Table for this division