The Fishy - Grimsby Town FC



League Two Table

  PGDPts
1Walsall20+1139
2Notts County20+1337
3Swindon20+937

4Bromley20+936
5MK Dons20+1433
6Salford20033
7Chesterfield20+532

8Crewe20+631
9Cambridge Utd20+431
10Gillingham20+630
11Fleetwood Town20+330
12Colchester20+628
13Barnet20+528
14Grimsby20+527
15Tranmere20+326
16Oldham20+224
17Accrington Stanley20024
18Barrow20-821
19Cheltenham20-1721
20Shrewsbury20-1319
21Crawley Town20-1018
22Harrogate Town20-1317

23Bristol Rovers20-2317
24Newport County20-1713

Full League Two Table
Prem|Champ|L1|L2|NL|NLN|NLS
SPL|SC|S1|S2

Follow the Fishy on Twitter
NewsNow logo

Question of the Week

Where will Grimsby finish?





 

History Repeats Itself

By: Rob Sedgwick
Date: 07/10/2000

12 NELC councillors are again unable to have a say in Monday's debate at the Town Hall on the new stadium, as all have to declare an "interest" in the Mariners. The twelve are not allowed to enter the debate or register a vote as they are either season tickets holders, or regularly attend games.

The reason for the ban is the same as that in the original meeting back on the 13th July, when the councillors voted 20-9 against modifying the authority's local plan to allow the stadium to be built in principle, the first step before planning permission could even proceed. On that occasion too a similar number of councillors were not allowed to register a vote or voice an opninion. The reason for the ban is worries about a precedent set when the Court of Appeal decided against councillors in a case Liverpool, with the judge deciding that being a season ticket holder was sufficient to count as "an interest" in stadium planning decisions. The council are meeting on Monday to discuss the findings of the report they commissioned from Gerald Eve, which concluded that the only suitable site for a new stadium in the entire county was the original site at Great Coates. This was also the result of the original independent report comissioned by the council, and which received the support of 90% of the population of the county in a poll conducted on behalf of the club. The decision effectively means that voters in 12 wards in the Grimsby area have no representatives at the council meeting, as the system is too inflexible to allow any alternative such as a replacement candidate to step in for the night. Hating football or supporting any team other than Grimsby Town is not sufficient to be deemed as "an interest". That said a good number of people felt let down by their "representatives" that were allowed to vote on July 13th. The remaining councillors will to have to dig themselves out of the hole that the council find themselves in without the help of their colleagues, with a second vote on the local plan seemingly the only way out for the councillors to save any face at all.

Add To Facebook


This site is by the fans, for the fans, and we will consider articles on any subject relating to the Mariners whether it be related to current news, a nostalgic look back in the past, a story about a player, a game or games in the past, something about Blundell Park or football in general. Click here to submit your article!


Related Stories


Forum Latest
Thread TitlePostsLatest Post
JANUARY TRANSFER WINDOW237ska face17/12 15:19
Pym191Epworth Mariner17/12 15:12
What's the Lincs Cup?11Ganpati Goonerz17/12 14:59
Prediction Thread Bromley A 25.2614MaccasBoots17/12 13:59
Summer Recruitment74Maringer17/12 13:12
Michael Jolley71diehardmariner17/12 10:52
Bromley away49HerveJosse17/12 10:13
TV Games/Upcoming Fixtures3SiteBot17/12 03:30
Back to winning ways4Marinerz9317/12 00:53
Evans8Teesknees16/12 21:25

This Season and previous Seasons