The Fishy - Grimsby Town FC



League Two Table

  PGDPts
1Bromley40+2579
2MK Dons40+3574
3Notts County40+2573

4Cambridge Utd39+2772
5Swindon40+1870
6Salford40+770
7Crewe40+1263

8Grimsby38+1662
9Chesterfield39+962
10Oldham39+1561
11Walsall40+761
12Barnet40+760
13Fleetwood Town40+255
14Colchester39+954
15Accrington Stanley39-648
16Bristol Rovers40-1846
17Gillingham39-1445
18Cheltenham38-2242
19Shrewsbury40-2741
20Tranmere39-2136
21Crawley Town40-2234
22Newport County40-2734

23Barrow39-2632
24Harrogate Town40-3130

Full League Two Table
Prem|Champ|L1|L2|NL|NLN|NLS
SPL|SC|S1|S2

Follow the Fishy on Twitter
NewsNow logo

Question of the Week

Who will win League 2?










 

The FA or Coronation Street? Take Your Pick!

By: Bill Osborne
Date: 02/08/2004

THE latest shenanigans at the FA which has culminated in the resignation of the CEO Mark Palios and the communications director Colin Gibson over the Sven Goran Eriksson affair has got all the makings of a good TV soapie!

Home > Editorials > The FA or Coronation Street?


Mr Eriksson, it appears, had a brief affair with a secretary at the FA. Not an unusual occurrence in offices around the country!

But it seems that the FA's CEO, Mark Palios, also had a brief fling with the same lady and when the press got hold of the details, Mr Palios sent his communications director to the newspaper concerned offering to provide all the details of Mr Eriksson's dilly dallying with the lady, if they did not mention Mr Palios's involvement.

Unfortunately, the newspaper was also wrongly informed that Mr Eriksson had been approached by the FA and had denied any involvement with the young lady, as a result of which an FA statement was issued claiming that Mr Eriksson had not been involved with her.

So the FA in its usual fashion decided to pass the buck somewhere and called for an inquiry as to who was misleading who, but the incorrect statement made by the FA is alleged to have had the approval of the chairman of the FA, Mr Geoff Thompson, and he will take part in the inquiry on Thursday.

Those wise enough to know how the FA works, where quick to recognise the ruse to designate the role of scapegoat to Mr Eriksson in an attempt to rid themselves of a manager earning 4 million quid a year without comparable results.

But it seems that Mr Eriksson is a wiser man than those ruling English football. He kept quiet until Thursday of last week revealing then that no one had approached him to ask if it was true that he was shagging some broad in the office. Had they done so they would have received an affirmative answer.

And why not? Mr Eriksson is a single man and, like all single men, has the right to shag who he pleases! (With their consent of course and with 4 million quid in the bank, he would get an awful lot of consents!)

But this is not a TV soapie.

These are the rulers of the English Football Association.

The same rulers of the FA that fines players 10,000 quid a go for giving opposition supporters 'the finger' claiming it brings the game into disrepute.

The same rulers of the FA that banned Rio Ferdinand for eight months for failing to keep an appointment with the drug testers, which he subsequently took 48 hours later, without any trace of drugs found.

The same rulers of the FA, who the Guardian refers to as, "This bunch in their chauffeured Mercs, their hyper-inflated salaries and their ironclad indifference to anyone's fortunes but their own".

This is a sad time for English football which will be deemed to have brought the game into disrepute world wide.

It would be a great tragedy if Eriksson gets the sack over this cock up by the FA. Brought about by their own cover up of their own sins.

Eriksson has done no wrong. His personal life is his own business. The FA brought it into the limelight but he told no lies. He did not mislead anyone. He candidly admits that he had a dalliance with a lady. That is not a crime. Not even for England's manager.

Eriksson should only be dismissed for football reasons and that is not likely to happen.

But there again, the FA have their own ways to do things, totally unrelated to justice, so there can be no guarantee that Eriksson will not get the chop.

How I long for the 'good old days' when football was 'respectable'. The only scandals in those days were when footballers murdered their wives, fixed matches and managers took 'bungs'!

Will it ever change?

Add To Facebook


This site is by the fans, for the fans, and we will consider articles on any subject relating to the Mariners whether it be related to current news, a nostalgic look back in the past, a story about a player, a game or games in the past, something about Blundell Park or football in general. Click here to submit your article!


Related Stories


Forum Latest
Thread TitlePostsLatest Post
England v Japan19MuddyWaters01/04 15:11
Lincoln City 1,297TownSNAFU501/04 14:59
Grimsby Town Foundation11HackneyHaddock01/04 14:56
Chaos at Barrow8TownSNAFU501/04 14:34
Where are you?74Southwark Mariner01/04 14:01
Ex-GTFC players thread5,002mariner chopper01/04 13:16
Our Three Internatiobals22Son of Cod01/04 12:45
Crawley9Son of Cod01/04 12:36
Begging bowl11chelseacity01/04 12:28
Prediction Thread Harrogate H 25.2621IlkleyMariner01/04 12:22

This Season and previous Seasons