The Fishy - Grimsby Town FC



League Two Table

  PGDPts
1Bromley33+2265
2Cambridge Utd33+2263
3MK Dons33+2961

4Notts County33+2061
5Swindon34+1661
6Crewe34+1053
7Chesterfield33+953

8Salford32+252
9Barnet34+650
10Walsall32+550
11Colchester32+1449
12Grimsby32+849
13Accrington Stanley33+246
14Fleetwood Town32+144
15Oldham31+442
16Gillingham32-141
17Shrewsbury34-1938
18Cheltenham33-2136
19Tranmere33-1235
20Bristol Rovers33-2430
21Crawley Town34-2128
22Barrow32-1727

23Harrogate Town35-2727
24Newport County33-2824

Full League Two Table
Prem|Champ|L1|L2|NL|NLN|NLS
SPL|SC|S1|S2

Follow the Fishy on Twitter
NewsNow logo

Question of the Week

Who will win League 2?










 

Share Issue Failure Blow To Stadium?

By: Bill Osborne
Date: 07/12/2001

THE GRIMSBY TELEGRAPH today published a story regarding the share issue failure with chairman Peter Furneaux calling it "a blow" in regard to the new stadium. The new share issue was blocked by some of the major shareholders including members of the previous board.

The report, by Stuart Rowson of the Grimsby Telegraph, states

GrimsbyTown chairman Peter Furneaux has vowed the board will not waiver in their pursuit of a new stadium despite a group of former directors vetoing their plans to inject £360,000 into the club kitty.

Furneaux admitted that the rejection of the share issue was a massive blow to the plans.

But he and the board will hold a meeting with the stadium developers on Monday as they look at the best way to push on with the project which goes before a public inquiry in the New Year.

"The stadium is the greatest way forward. The share issue was a blow but we have to find a way around it," he said.

The club must raise £14-mil lion for the proposed new stadium near Great Coates and had hoped to raise some cash by unlocking the capital in 360,000 unissued shares.

That move was blocked at an emergency general meeting a fortnight ago but the club are still desperate to move from the outdated facilities at Blundell Park - especially with the prospect of a breakaway Premier League Two on the horizon.

"If we can't issue 360,000 shares, it makes it difficult when we need £4-million to get the stadium underway.

"But we're not putting it on hold and this football club is 100 per cent behind a new stadium. I want to make that clear."

The share release was rejected after previous chairman Bill Carr and former directors Clive Aspinall and Stephen Bygott, backed by some other share holders, voted against.

Furneaux held talks in a bid to ease the in-fighting which has plagued the club for years, but says that the Carr group has yet to take the olive branch.

"There are no applications to join the board before us."

"I've made the overtures for them to come aboard but, as yet, nothing has happened. We'll just continue to get on with making this club successful.

"We must have the resolve to take this club forward and we do have it. It's been made difficult, but that doesn't mean the problem is insurmountable and that we won't succeed.

"We need a break - on the pitch and off it."

Billo says: I admit to being a little puzzled. I may have been mistaken but I believe that a statement earlier this year indicated that the share issue would raise additional funds to assist the club through its present financial difficulties.

My understanding was that the stadium project was a separate issue to the rest of the club's business problems and that sponsorships, grants, advertising and the sale of Blundell Park were all part of the funding effort for the new stadium.

If one is talking of a £14 million stadium, £340,000, which will help, is hardly a sufficient amount to cast doubt on, or jeopardise the project a great deal.

But the chairman is right in worrying about the shareholders not voting in favour of the new rights issue. If the stadium project is to be successful, it will need every shareholder and supporter to back the board.

An olive branch has been proffered to those who baulked the move but no response has been received so far. Let us hope that the past board are not going to play political games at the expense of the club.

Maybe the time has come for Bill Carr and Co to state their position and give some indication of their future intentions.



Add To Facebook


This site is by the fans, for the fans, and we will consider articles on any subject relating to the Mariners whether it be related to current news, a nostalgic look back in the past, a story about a player, a game or games in the past, something about Blundell Park or football in general. Click here to submit your article!


Related Stories


Forum Latest
Thread TitlePostsLatest Post
Mcatee YouTube 23Darkside of The Humber27/02 21:19
Highest paid wages in L29Spurn boy27/02 20:59
Prediction Thread Notts Cty A 25.2626Grantham_Mariner27/02 18:52
DA111Mappers27/02 17:53
Thank you staff and players11The Yard Dog27/02 12:58
Average price of 74 quid a ticket in the PL7diehardmariner27/02 12:32
Final game of the National League17diehardmariner27/02 12:27
Sheff Wednesday 26diehardmariner27/02 10:05
Notts County82dapperz fun pub27/02 10:00
Lincoln City 1,202diehardmariner27/02 09:58

This Season and previous Seasons