Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Fishy Forum Fishy Boards Archive › Awful defence
Users Browsing Forum
Googlebot and 190 Guests

Awful defence

  This thread currently has 2,377 views. Print
2 Pages 1 2 All Recommend Thread
It Bites
January 23, 2022, 11:33am
Champagne Drinker
Posts: 2,320
Posts Per Day: 1.46
Reputation: 48.89%
Rep Score: +4 / -10
Approval: +2,208
Gold Stars: 266
Logged
Private Message
Hagrid
January 23, 2022, 11:36am

Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 12,038
Posts Per Day: 2.80
Reputation: 71.14%
Rep Score: +49 / -21
Approval: +20,489
Gold Stars: 537
Oh we’re gonna be the first team that Dover Beat i can see it😂
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 1 - 18
promotion plaice
January 23, 2022, 11:38am

Moderator
Posts: 19,676
Posts Per Day: 3.85
Reputation: 64.79%
Rep Score: +20 / -13
Location: Cleethorpes
Approval: +17,082
Gold Stars: 201

Our game is 5:50 minutes in for anyone interested.


When Leeds trainer Les Cocker was once told Norman Hunter had broken a leg, he asked: “Whose is it?”
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 2 - 18
ska face
January 23, 2022, 11:41am

Vodka Drinker
Posts: 7,219
Posts Per Day: 1.21
Reputation: 80.94%
Rep Score: +60 / -14
Approval: +21,780
Gold Stars: 852
Own goal the second one, wasn’t it? Christ knows how they’ve give it to their No.8, he was nowhere near it
Logged
Private Message
Reply: 3 - 18
promotion plaice
January 23, 2022, 11:43am

Moderator
Posts: 19,676
Posts Per Day: 3.85
Reputation: 64.79%
Rep Score: +20 / -13
Location: Cleethorpes
Approval: +17,082
Gold Stars: 201
Quoted from ska face
Own goal the second one, wasn’t it? Christ knows how they’ve give it to their No.8, he was nowhere near it

Maybe time to give Macca another chance  



When Leeds trainer Les Cocker was once told Norman Hunter had broken a leg, he asked: “Whose is it?”
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 4 - 18
ska face
January 23, 2022, 11:46am

Vodka Drinker
Posts: 7,219
Posts Per Day: 1.21
Reputation: 80.94%
Rep Score: +60 / -14
Approval: +21,780
Gold Stars: 852
Like fúck.

Crocombe solid yesterday, very confident off his line against a team of 7ft freaks and great double save just before half time. Looks like he’d have beaten Cheek to that 2nd too if McAtee hadn’t missed the header.
Logged
Private Message
Reply: 5 - 18
Chrisblor
January 23, 2022, 11:50am

Elemér Berkessy
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 7,296
Posts Per Day: 1.22
Reputation: 75.24%
Rep Score: +53 / -18
Location: somewhere along the m180
Approval: +8,961
Gold Stars: 241
I'm finding some of this Crocombe criticism bizarre. He's been way better in the air than McKeown's ever been, and his shot stopping and kicking hasn't been any worse in comparison.


gary jones
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 6 - 18
MuddyWaters
January 23, 2022, 12:00pm
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 14,125
Posts Per Day: 2.60
Reputation: 68.15%
Rep Score: +48 / -24
Approval: +32,288
Gold Stars: 236
Quoted from promotion plaice

Maybe time to give Macca another chance  



What? And replace the keeper who kept us in the game yesterday? You know, the one who actually comes and catches crosses.
Logged
Private Message
Reply: 7 - 18
HertsGTFC
January 23, 2022, 12:30pm

Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 14,115
Posts Per Day: 4.25
Reputation: 75.4%
Rep Score: +29 / -10
Location: Stevenage
Approval: +22,998
Gold Stars: 228
I wasn’t sure whether Crocombe was an improvement on Macca, yesterday confirmed he is despite being on the losing side, as well as his all round game he sounds like a much better communicator too.


"Crombie you would have got to that if you weren't such a fat ba%$@rd" - George Kerr, inspiration from the dug out 70s style  
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 8 - 18
blundellpork
January 23, 2022, 12:53pm

Table Wine Drinker
Posts: 543
Posts Per Day: 0.09
Reputation: 72.83%
Rep Score: +3 / -2
Approval: +1,668
Gold Stars: 32
Coke shilly shallying towards his own goal was just a complete disaster.

It was a time to hack it clear, and you can’t lay the blame with the defence or goalkeeper.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 9 - 18
fishcake63
January 23, 2022, 1:15pm
Table Wine Drinker
Posts: 894
Posts Per Day: 0.50
Reputation: 86.91%
Rep Score: +5 / 0
Approval: +1,225
Gold Stars: 62
yesterdays goals was nothing to do with defence , our most experianced operator making a schoolboy error & an own goal cost us a game we was in complete control of for half hour proble is the other 60 we was poor
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 10 - 18
HertsGTFC
January 23, 2022, 1:19pm

Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 14,115
Posts Per Day: 4.25
Reputation: 75.4%
Rep Score: +29 / -10
Location: Stevenage
Approval: +22,998
Gold Stars: 228
Quoted from fishcake63
yesterdays goals was nothing to do with defence , our most experianced operator making a schoolboy error & an own goal cost us a game we was in complete control of for half hour proble is the other 60 we was poor


We are a bit did organised at set pieces though, against Chesterfield the defence left LJL to look after Tshimanga and we all know how that ended.


"Crombie you would have got to that if you weren't such a fat ba%$@rd" - George Kerr, inspiration from the dug out 70s style  
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 11 - 18
Bigdog
January 23, 2022, 3:08pm
Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 3,383
Posts Per Day: 1.12
Reputation: 93.81%
Rep Score: +36 / -1
Approval: +11,802
Gold Stars: 162
Quoted from fishcake63
yesterdays goals was nothing to do with defence , our most experianced operator making a schoolboy error & an own goal cost us a game we was in complete control of for half hour proble is the other 60 we was poor


Maybe.. but.. anyone seriously think that a Waterfall/Pearson pairing is a promotion winning centre back partnership?
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 12 - 18
MuddyWaters
January 23, 2022, 3:14pm
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 14,125
Posts Per Day: 2.60
Reputation: 68.15%
Rep Score: +48 / -24
Approval: +32,288
Gold Stars: 236
Quoted from Bigdog


Maybe.. but.. anyone seriously think that a Waterfall/Pearson pairing is a promotion winning centre back partnership?


I’m not sure to be honest. We were conceding enough early season but just scoring more. It’s the failure to convert chances that’s costing us.

Logged
Private Message
Reply: 13 - 18
Gaffer58
January 23, 2022, 3:24pm
Brandy Drinker
Posts: 2,989
Posts Per Day: 0.87
Reputation: 57.51%
Rep Score: +6 / -8
Approval: +4,096
Gold Stars: 33
Macca would of been flapping about, that’s if he came off his line, playing against their defenders yesterday, and as the majority of teams at this level play the high ball into the box then Crocombe is an improvement.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 14 - 18
Kris2
January 23, 2022, 3:30pm
Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 3,627
Posts Per Day: 0.65
Reputation: 54.03%
Rep Score: +16 / -18
Approval: +2,632
Gold Stars: 136
Quoted from blundellpork
Coke shilly shallying towards his own goal was just a complete disaster.

It was a time to hack it clear, and you can’t lay the blame with the defence or goalkeeper.


Was screaming for him to get rid of it. Just kick it anywhere at that point with three players around you. Wtf was he doing!?
Logged
Private Message
Reply: 15 - 18
mimma
January 23, 2022, 4:01pm
Brandy Drinker
Posts: 2,652
Posts Per Day: 0.44
Reputation: 85.27%
Rep Score: +15 / -2
Approval: +5,574
Gold Stars: 78
As someone that has played in goal, I find the criticism of Crocomb bizarre.  He was cleanly taking the ball off the heads of their forwards and is a vast improvement of Macca when it comes to crosses. The 2nd goal they put players on the line that stopped him from getting to the cross. What could he have done to stop it?  It was just one of those things that can happen in a crowded area. If we concede a goal do we have to change the defence? Of course not. You don't win games chopping and changing all the time.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 16 - 18
Bigdog
January 23, 2022, 4:14pm
Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 3,383
Posts Per Day: 1.12
Reputation: 93.81%
Rep Score: +36 / -1
Approval: +11,802
Gold Stars: 162
Quoted from Bigdog


Maybe.. but.. anyone seriously think that a Waterfall/Pearson pairing is a promotion winning centre back partnership?


There are other areas of the team that need addressing like the midfield, but my point is, at the start of the season our current pairing were probably most people's third and fourth choice centre halves when imagining us to be a promotion winning team. Waterfall has out performed expectations true, but how has Hurst mismanaged the squad so quickly for them to be first choice? Apart from two or three exceptions, we've got a team full of solidish mid-table National League players achieving less than solid mid-table National League results, and managed by someone who's got a 10% winning record over the past three years or so. Taking our home gates and income into account, we should be mixing it with Wrexham, Stockport, Chesterfield and Notts County and if a couple of them have got extra income streams we should be trying to compete with them on that level. Those clubs will be top four by the end of the season, so it proves that they're using a winning formula for this division. And if two of them go up, there will be a couple coming down and a couple more existing clubs down here that find that extra funding for players. JS has stated there are people in the wings he can call on if needed for infrastructure investment, but in the short term it may be a sounder investment to boost the playing budget as we go into life without EFL funding and try and win that EFL funding back sooner rather than later.

Start with a new manager, compete on an even footing with the biggest in this division until will get promoted. If we don't, we'll be down here a very long time and all the long term planning in the world will be meaningless and have very little outcome value..

So it wasn't a dig specifically at Shaun and Luke, but more of a point about how we've settled in at this level again. Solid 5th tier but never threatening the top end of the table and the acceptance of a bit of mediocracy sprinkled with the ever existing virtuous vain loyal hope rather than seeing things for what they really are..

Positives at the minute are three or four quality players, improved playing surfaces, higher home attendances (for now), our amazing away support and vastly improved matchday fayre, but is it enough and are we doing anywhere near enough to get us out of this division? Real world results suggest we're way off..
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 17 - 18
goldenfish
January 23, 2022, 4:14pm
Shandy Drinker
Posts: 75
Posts Per Day: 0.03
Reputation: 81.78%
Rep Score: +1 / 0
Approval: +212
Gold Stars: 16
Defence did well yesterday , under a lot of pressure … 2 errors , and as usual for us , paid the highest price for both … was a horrid scrappy game with little quality .. point each would have been fair ..
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 18 - 18
2 Pages 1 2 All Recommend Thread
Print

Fishy Forum Fishy Boards Archive › Awful defence

Back to top of page

This is not an official forum of Grimsby Town Football Club, the opinions expressed are those of the individual authors. If you see an offensive post then click "Report" on the relevant post. Posts will be deleted at the discretion of the moderators whose decision is final. Posts should abide by the Forum Rules. IP addresses of contributors together with dates and times of access are stored. The opinions and viewpoints expressed by contributors to The Fishy are their own and not necessarily those of The Fishy. The Fishy makes no claims that information dispersed through this forum is accurate or reliable. Also The Fishy cannot be held liable for any statements made by contributors of The Fishy.