Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Fishy Forum Fishy Boards Archive › Off Side or not Off side
Users Browsing Forum
AdSense, Googlebot and 145 Guests

Off Side or not Off side

  This thread currently has 3,678 views. Print
6 Pages Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All Recommend Thread
moosey_club
January 15, 2023, 11:27am
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 16,204
Posts Per Day: 2.70
Reputation: 76.19%
Rep Score: +69 / -22
Approval: +20,306
Gold Stars: 227
As was discussed on MOTD and also during match commentary on Talksport the word is "impeding" not interfering.

Interfering doesn't exist,  you have to impede an opponent now..so block them, prevent them getting the ball or block their vision...I don't think Rashford did any of that yesterday so the goal stood.



2023/24 DLWDDWDLLLWDLLLLWDDDWDLLWLDLLDWDDWLLDWLWLWL but not NLN 😁
2022/23LDWDWWDWLLDWWDLLLDLWLLWLWLLWDDLDWWDDDLLWDWLWLW
2021/22 WDWWWWDLWWWWLLLWLLDLWLLWWDWWWLWDLWWDWWWDLWD play offs WWW Promoted 🥳
2020/21  LLDWWLDLDWLWLLLDLWLLDLLDLLLWLLLDDDDWDDDLWLWLWL .. hello darkness my old friend
2019/20  WDLDWWLDLWWLLLDLDLDLDDWWDLLWDDWWL WLLW - ended
2018/19  LWDDLLLLLLWWDWLLLWDWLWWWWLLLLWWWWDLLLDDLLDLWLW Hello Scunny  
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 10 - 50
Hagrid
January 15, 2023, 11:30am

Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 12,039
Posts Per Day: 2.80
Reputation: 71.14%
Rep Score: +49 / -21
Approval: +20,499
Gold Stars: 538
Offside
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 11 - 50
lew chaterleys lover
January 15, 2023, 11:40am
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 5,023
Posts Per Day: 1.07
Reputation: 75.9%
Rep Score: +30 / -10
Approval: +10,762
Gold Stars: 237
Quoted from moosey_club
As was discussed on MOTD and also during match commentary on Talksport the word is "impeding" not interfering.

Interfering doesn't exist,  you have to impede an opponent now..so block them, prevent them getting the ball or block their vision...I don't think Rashford did any of that yesterday so the goal stood.



I'm sure other clubs will try a variation on this theme now the precedents have been set.

Run clearly offside, distract the defenders, run with the ball without touching it and see a deeper lying team mate smash it home.

The rules seem to change every week as that goal would not have stood last week!
Logged
Private Message
Reply: 12 - 50
GollyGTFC
January 15, 2023, 12:21pm

Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 3,974
Posts Per Day: 0.69
Reputation: 67.2%
Rep Score: +19 / -11
Approval: +6,056
Gold Stars: 358
Quoted from Poojah
They discussed this on MOTD last night, pouring over the unnecessarily complex and increasingly recondite rules. On the official basis of those, I’m still none the wiser.

My understanding has always been that if a player is “interfering”, then he’s offside. That could be by blocking the ‘keeper’s view or impeding a defender’s ability to to their job.

In this instance, Edison doesn’t know and certainly can’t assume can’t assume that Rashford’s offside, and yet he gets within a yard of striking the ball before Fernandes takes over, which surely impacts how the goalkeeper would have approached the finish. He’s got to consider two possible shots from two different players. In that sense, Rashford’s absolutely interfering.

For that goal to stand, Rashford has to make clear that he has given up going for the ball almost as soon as he makes his run. He’s offside. I have no idea why the authorities insist on making their own lives so difficult.


This isn’t a new interpretation of offside though is it? It’s been like this for years and years. We scored a very similar goal to this away at Notts County in 2008/09 season. Ball slid through to someone clearly offside, linesman put his flag up and then Danny Boshell ran in from an onside position to score.
Logged Offline
Private Message Skype
Reply: 13 - 50
GollyGTFC
January 15, 2023, 12:27pm

Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 3,974
Posts Per Day: 0.69
Reputation: 67.2%
Rep Score: +19 / -11
Approval: +6,056
Gold Stars: 358
Here it is…

[tweet]1514136285568540674[/tweet]
Logged Offline
Private Message Skype
Reply: 14 - 50
quebec38
January 15, 2023, 12:30pm
Snakebite drinker
Posts: 459
Posts Per Day: 0.18
Reputation: 82.36%
Rep Score: +6 / -1
Approval: +1,588
Gold Stars: 48
Ran towards the ball then shielded it from a defender. How the goal was given is beyond me. They have ruined the rule.
Logged
Private Message
Reply: 15 - 50
GrimRob
January 15, 2023, 12:46pm

Moderator
Posts: 12,697
Posts Per Day: 2.11
Reputation: 69.92%
Rep Score: +76 / -34
Approval: +13,450
Gold Stars: 115
Interfering with play is no longer a requirement?


'Tis better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all.  
~ Alfred Lord Tennyson

Logged Offline
Site Private Message Skype
Reply: 16 - 50
jimgtfc
January 15, 2023, 12:47pm
Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 3,009
Posts Per Day: 0.64
Reputation: 81.05%
Rep Score: +22 / -5
Approval: +5,102
Gold Stars: 46
Offside without a doubt. Several reasons, firstly Akanji changes his movement to play Rashford offside, Rashford then makes his move towards the ball, despite not touching the ball he is in possession of it as it is only a couple of feet away from him for a couple of seconds, Rashford then gets himself in between Akanji and the ball preventing the defender from making a full and unchallenged run towards the ball, Rashford then pulls his foot back as if to strike the ball making the defenders and goalkeeper believe he is about to shoot. All that and yet somehow, with the benefit of replays, he is not interfering with play. A terrible decision, possibly the worst since the introduction of VAR.


"Falls to Arnold... Arnold! That's it! Thats it! He's sealed it! Grimsby Town are back in the football league!!! Just a minute to go and Nathan Arnold makes it 3-1! Look at the scenes behind the goal! Look at the relief! The agony is finally over!!!"

John Tondeur - Wembley Stadium Sunday 15th May 2016
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 17 - 50
GrimRob
January 15, 2023, 12:51pm

Moderator
Posts: 12,697
Posts Per Day: 2.11
Reputation: 69.92%
Rep Score: +76 / -34
Approval: +13,450
Gold Stars: 115
I think it could well be the right decision but the law is inadequate.

Offside offence
A player in an offside position at the moment the ball is played or touched* by a team-mate is only penalised on becoming involved in active play by:

  
  • interfering with play by playing or touching a ball passed or touched by a team-mate or
      
  • interfering with an opponent by:
            preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the opponent’s line of vision or
      
  •       challenging an opponent for the ball or
      
  •       clearly attempting to play a ball which is close when this action impacts on an opponent or
      
  •      making an obvious action which clearly impacts on the ability of an opponent to play the ball

or

    gaining an advantage by playing the ball or interfering with an opponent when it has:
        rebounded or been deflected off the goalpost, crossbar or an opponent
        been deliberately saved by any opponent

A player in an offside position receiving the ball from an opponent who deliberately plays the ball, including by deliberate handball, is not considered to have gained an advantage, unless it was a deliberate save by any opponent. 


'Tis better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all.  
~ Alfred Lord Tennyson

Logged Offline
Site Private Message Skype
Reply: 18 - 50
supertown
January 15, 2023, 2:08pm
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 5,386
Posts Per Day: 0.90
Reputation: 74.86%
Rep Score: +25 / -9
Approval: +3,471
Gold Stars: 53
It was a farce of a decision, and I still don’t understand the Salah decision last weekend 🤷🏼‍♂️
Logged Online
Private Message
Reply: 19 - 50
6 Pages Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All Recommend Thread
Print

Fishy Forum Fishy Boards Archive › Off Side or not Off side

Back to top of page

This is not an official forum of Grimsby Town Football Club, the opinions expressed are those of the individual authors. If you see an offensive post then click "Report" on the relevant post. Posts will be deleted at the discretion of the moderators whose decision is final. Posts should abide by the Forum Rules. IP addresses of contributors together with dates and times of access are stored. The opinions and viewpoints expressed by contributors to The Fishy are their own and not necessarily those of The Fishy. The Fishy makes no claims that information dispersed through this forum is accurate or reliable. Also The Fishy cannot be held liable for any statements made by contributors of The Fishy.