|
|
League Two Table
| P | GD | Pts | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Barnet | 7 | +7 | 15 |
| 2 | Cheltenham | 8 | +4 | 15 |
| 3 | Bristol Rovers | 8 | +2 | 15 |
| 4 | York | 8 | +6 | 14 |
| 5 | Walsall | 8 | +6 | 14 |
| 6 | Grimsby | 8 | +4 | 13 |
| 7 | Salford | 8 | +2 | 13 |
| 8 | Gillingham | 8 | +2 | 12 |
| 9 | Crewe | 8 | +2 | 12 |
| 10 | Tranmere | 8 | +2 | 11 |
| 11 | Chesterfield | 8 | +1 | 11 |
| 12 | Swindon | 8 | -3 | 11 |
| 13 | Rotherham | 8 | 0 | 10 |
| 14 | Fleetwood Town | 8 | 0 | 10 |
| 15 | Colchester | 8 | -2 | 10 |
| 16 | Rochdale | 8 | -2 | 10 |
| 17 | Newport County | 8 | 0 | 9 |
| 18 | Shrewsbury | 8 | -6 | 8 |
| 19 | Accrington Stanley | 8 | -3 | 7 |
| 20 | Oldham | 8 | -4 | 7 |
| 21 | Exeter | 8 | -2 | 6 |
| 22 | Northampton | 7 | -3 | 6 |
| 23 | Port Vale | 7 | -6 | 5 |
| 24 | Crawley Town | 7 | -7 | 4 |
Full League Two Table
Prem|Champ|L1|L2|NL|NLN|NLS
SPL|SC|S1|S2
Burnley Reflections
By: David Wilkinson
Date: 24/11/2001
NOT a bad result - who could have expected better against the top of the table? It could have been worse - if the ref had given the penalty it would have been 2-0 and if the one that hit the bar had gone in it would have been 3.
Our problem - as ever - is that we don't look like scoring. We could have defended better, on the other hand we kept them down to one goal. We looked OK going forward but, in their box, we just never looked like scoring a goal. Allen runs enthusiastically but neither holds the ball up or looks dangerous in the box. Rowan is too lightweight, despite working hard.
When Jevons came on he didn't make much of a difference. Pouton continues to take the set pieces (and was better at it than against Millwall) but seems a strange choice considering who LL had on the field.
The question remains the same - are we good enough to avoid relegation? I fear the answer is no. Our problem is not our points tally or position in the table. It is that we simply do not dominate a game long enough to look like we are better than the opposition.
With the exception of the home win against Birmingham, we have not really dominated a game all season. We look like an outfit that is struggling - whether it is against a team from the top of the table or the bottom.
I think it is too late to get any benefit from sacking Lawrence. That should be reserved until the end of the season. If we stay up, so should he. If we go down he should be sacked and replaced with another who has a combination of experience plus the ability to scour the lower leagues for bargains who can make the grade in a higher division. These players have the benefit of a longer term transfer value - unlike LL's pointless overseas loans who are expensive, rarely make the grade and then disappear.
This site is by the fans, for the fans, and we will consider articles on any subject relating to the Mariners whether it be related to current news, a nostalgic look back in the past, a story about a player, a game or games in the past, something about Blundell Park or football in general. Click here to submit your article!
Related Stories
| Thread Title | Posts | Latest Post | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Behaviour of "stickies" | 8 | bedders78 | 29/09 10:16 |
| Match Thread Newport A 26/27 | 358 | lew chaterleys lover | 29/09 10:13 |
| What will happen to Man City | 11 | HertsGTFC | 29/09 09:53 |
| Hull City | 53 | Croxton | 29/09 08:17 |
| Just back.....from the golf course.... | 110 | Darkside of The Humber | 29/09 06:50 |
| TV Games/Upcoming Fixtures | 3 | SiteBot | 29/09 04:30 |
| Ex-GTFC players thread | 5,247 | pizzzza | 28/09 20:59 |
| Drinking ban in stands | 102 | ska face | 28/09 20:28 |
| Bradford | 10 | Lincoln Mariner 56 | 28/09 18:22 |
| Lincoln City | 1,464 | ginnywings | 28/09 15:21 |