|
|
League Two Table
| P | GD | Pts | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bromley | 39 | +26 | 79 |
| 2 | MK Dons | 39 | +36 | 74 |
| 3 | Cambridge Utd | 38 | +28 | 72 |
| 4 | Notts County | 38 | +26 | 70 |
| 5 | Swindon | 39 | +18 | 69 |
| 6 | Salford | 39 | +6 | 67 |
| 7 | Grimsby | 38 | +16 | 62 |
| 8 | Chesterfield | 39 | +9 | 62 |
| 9 | Crewe | 39 | +11 | 60 |
| 10 | Walsall | 39 | +7 | 60 |
| 11 | Oldham | 37 | +13 | 58 |
| 12 | Barnet | 39 | +6 | 57 |
| 13 | Fleetwood Town | 39 | +2 | 54 |
| 14 | Colchester | 38 | +9 | 53 |
| 15 | Accrington Stanley | 38 | -4 | 48 |
| 16 | Gillingham | 38 | -12 | 45 |
| 17 | Bristol Rovers | 39 | -20 | 43 |
| 18 | Cheltenham | 38 | -22 | 42 |
| 19 | Shrewsbury | 39 | -26 | 41 |
| 20 | Tranmere | 39 | -21 | 36 |
| 21 | Crawley Town | 39 | -24 | 31 |
| 22 | Newport County | 39 | -28 | 31 |
| 23 | Harrogate Town | 39 | -29 | 30 |
| 24 | Barrow | 38 | -27 | 29 |
Full League Two Table
Prem|Champ|L1|L2|NL|NLN|NLS
SPL|SC|S1|S2
Stoke Report Card
By: Dr Fishy
Date: 10/02/2003
WHAT a privilege it is to write about a Town win! It makes a change from the usual drab and rather predictable average grades that the players earn from their week to week defeats.
|
Home > 2002-2003 Season > Report Cards > Stoke (h) |
So, a clean sheet, two goals, plenty of chances and above all, three points from a six-pointer. It puts daylight between the Mariners and Stoke for the time being, at least. But for how long?
Coyne: For once his kicking was very good. Never really got tested, thankfully. Read situations well.
Grade: B-
McDermott: The captain out-jumped Iwelumo in the early stages and also held the big striker off the ball on a few occasions. Good solid, all-round performance from Macca.
Grade: B-
Gallimore: It wasn't a bad performance against his old club. His covering at the back was good although he didn't block enough crosses.
Grade: C+
Ford: Appeared to have redeemed himself from the dip in form. Good in the air, strong in the challenge and played some decent passes out of defence.
Grade: B-
Santos: Had Iwelumo in his pocket all afternoon. Job well done.
Grade: B
Cooke: Good at drifting in-field and surging forward. Looked like the creative spark in the team but dwelled too much at times.
Grade: B-
Campbell: Carried the ball well and drifted past three challenges in the second half that nearly led to a great solo goal. Got back well to defend.
Grade: B-
Groves: Played some intelligent balls through to Boulding and sat back in midfield to help soak up the pressure.
Grade: C+
Pouton: This was a superb return to action for the Geordie. Put himself about, challenged anything that moved and set up the first goal.
Grade: B+
Thompson: Won free kicks all afternoon, not that he dived, but he was just a thorn in Stoke's defence. Deservedly got his goal before half time.
Grade: B
Boulding: Signs are that he is nearing full fitness. Took players on for pace - a little too greedy at times - but there were glimpses of what he is capable of. Took his goal well, getting there before the keeper.
Grade: B-
SUBS
Soames: Played direct and caused one or two problems when he had the ball. Got Shtanuk sent off by simply being too fast for him.
Grade: C+
Bolder + Rowan: Came on too late to grade but they played their part in maintaining the lead.
Grade Guide
| A* | This is almost impossible to achieve as I will refuse to give anyone this grade - unless they score six goals and get opposing players sent off. |
| A | This is more possible to achieve, although the player must have had a brilliant game i.e. he can't have put a foot wrong all match. |
| A- | The player must have performed superbly, setting up goals, scoring goals, making match-winning tackles etc. |
| B+ | The player played to a very high standard indeed having been influential throughout the 90 minutes. |
| B | This can be achieved if the player had a very good game overall but could be forgiven for making one or two minor mistakes. |
| B- | The player put in a performance worthy of special mention for his efforts on the pitch or otherwise having a good game. |
| C+ | A mark for players who have had an average game but at the same time played well in patches and may have had an impact on the final score. |
| C | An average performance but not worthy of being dropped for the next game - a competent performance. |
| C- | Start thinking about the player's attitude and commitment on the pitch. Showed little effort and was probably invisible for most of the match. |
| D+ | Poor game and realistically shouldn't feature in the next game. |
| D | This player shouldn't be playing in the near future. |
| D- | The player deserves to be fined for his abysmal performance |
| E | The player should be sacked |
| F | And then shot |
This site is by the fans, for the fans, and we will consider articles on any subject relating to the Mariners whether it be related to current news, a nostalgic look back in the past, a story about a player, a game or games in the past, something about Blundell Park or football in general. Click here to submit your article!
Related Stories
| Thread Title | Posts | Latest Post | |
|---|---|---|---|
| JDS | 41 | MuddyWaters | 22/03 07:31 |
| Danny Rose | 32 | Darkside of The Humber | 22/03 07:30 |
| Lincoln City | 1,271 | NorfolkImp | 22/03 07:10 |
| The Run In Begins | 8 | AdamHaddock | 22/03 03:36 |
| TV Games/Upcoming Fixtures | 4 | SiteBot | 22/03 03:30 |
| Is there anywhere to watch your highlights with | 9 | ginnywings | 22/03 01:18 |
| Just Back | 46 | Mayaman | 22/03 01:09 |
| Da and the pitch | 3 | petethemariner | 21/03 23:56 |
| Barrow Match Thread | 116 | rancido | 21/03 18:32 |
| Blundell Park | 33 | LN8Mariner | 21/03 16:21 |