Home Home Calendar Calendar Search Search Register Register Login Login
Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Fishy Forum › Fishy Boards › Archive › Suspensions
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 69 Guests

Suspensions

  This thread currently has 4,988 views. Print
4 Pages Prev 1 2 3 4 All Recommend Thread
Les Brechin
July 31, 2014, 3:02pm

Moderator
Posts: 23,822
Posts Per Day: 4.16
Reputation: 82.43%
Rep Score: +114 / -24
Location: Grimsby
Approval: +12,730
Gold Stars: 174
sodomist.


[img]https://news.images.itv.com/image/file/402260/image_update_img.jpg[/img]
OFFICIAL FUNDRAISER FOR THE BRAIN TUMOUR CHARITY
TOTAL AMOUNT RAISED SINCE AUGUST 2008 £16613.24

LATEST DONATION - FROM DONATION FROM THE FISHY FORUM - AUG 2023 AMOUNT RAISED £170.00
        
Logged Offline
Private Message
1
1
0
 Reply: 30 - 35
promotion plaice
July 31, 2014, 3:11pm

Moderator
Posts: 19,693
Posts Per Day: 3.85
Reputation: 64.79%
Rep Score: +20 / -13
Location: Cleethorpes
Approval: +17,086
Gold Stars: 201
Today's telegraph - Paul Hurst revealed why Grimsby Town didn't appeal against Scott Neilson's red card at Gateshead last season.

Television replays appeared to suggest that Neilson's challenge - on Craig Baxter - was contact - free.

Explaining why no appeal was lodged in the aftermath of the sending off, Hurst said:

"It wasn't the first thing on my mind at that time, and when we looked at it, the league informed us that it was too late".
"so that was a bit of a disappointment".


When Leeds trainer Les Cocker was once told Norman Hunter had broken a leg, he asked: “Whose is it?”
Logged Offline
Private Message
0
0
0
 Reply: 31 - 35
Madeleymariner
July 31, 2014, 6:39pm

Vodka Drinker
Posts: 6,051
Posts Per Day: 1.01
Reputation: 64.28%
Rep Score: +23 / -15
Approval: +3,074
Gold Stars: 52
Quoted from promotion plaice
Today's telegraph - Paul Hurst revealed why Grimsby Town didn't appeal against Scott Neilson's red card at Gateshead last season.

Television replays appeared to suggest that Neilson's challenge - on Craig Baxter - was contact - free.

Explaining why no appeal was lodged in the aftermath of the sending off, Hurst said:

"It wasn't the first thing on my mind at that time, and when we looked at it, the league informed us that it was too late".
"so that was a bit of a disappointment".


Wow well professional, almost on a par with Woods lack of subs in that FA Cup match. Why did they not look at it next day.
Logged Offline
Private Message
0
0
0
 Reply: 32 - 35
Garth
July 31, 2014, 6:54pm

Season Ticket Holder
Posts: 11,496
Posts Per Day: 1.91
Reputation: 80.75%
Rep Score: +55 / -13
Approval: +4,936
Gold Stars: 27
Quoted from 1739
Very odd. Why are we saying suspensions don't count for Lincs cup games but boston are saying they do. I know you are defiantly not allowed trialists.


If the club are in any doubt it only requires an Email to the FA,  and the reply to be proof of the correct procedure to be used
Logged Offline
Private Message
0
0
0
 Reply: 33 - 35
northbankmariner
July 31, 2014, 9:08pm

Cocktail Drinker
Posts: 1,728
Posts Per Day: 0.33
Reputation: 87.61%
Rep Score: +27 / -3
Location: the wrong side of the bridge
Approval: +525
Am diss appointed that people are getting stressed about the suspensions. Trust me this is not the big deal it is being made out to be. Doig , the tv star whose name I have temporary forgotten and I dare say bignot call all play center half. I have confidence in all those 3 and so should you all. Neison will be covered by the introduction of Arnold. I personally do not think this us weakening the team that much if I am honest. We are a squad, not just a starting 11 and I feel everyone of our current squad is worthy and good enough. So in short don't panic the suspensions will not hit us as hard as what fans are fearing.


CLAP
CLAP
CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP
FISH
Logged Offline
Private Message
2
0
0
 Reply: 34 - 35
Grimal
July 31, 2014, 11:25pm
Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 3,406
Posts Per Day: 0.89
Reputation: 79.34%
Rep Score: +19 / -5
Approval: +2,878
Gold Stars: 9
Quoted from promotion plaice
Today's telegraph - Paul Hurst revealed why Grimsby Town didn't appeal against Scott Neilson's red card at Gateshead last season.

Television replays appeared to suggest that Neilson's challenge - on Craig Baxter - was contact - free.

Explaining why no appeal was lodged in the aftermath of the sending off, Hurst said:

"It wasn't the first thing on my mind at that time, and when we looked at it, the league informed us that it was too late".
"so that was a bit of a disappointment".



I would imagine with the short time we had to appeal,Paul wouldn't have been sure Scott was going to re-sign .
Logged Offline
Private Message
1
0
0
 Reply: 35 - 35
4 Pages Prev 1 2 3 4 All Recommend Thread
Print

Fishy Forum › Fishy Boards › Archive › Suspensions

Back to top of page

This is not an official forum of Grimsby Town Football Club, the opinions expressed are those of the individual authors. If you see an offensive post then click "Report" on the relevant post. Posts will be deleted at the discretion of the moderators whose decision is final. Posts should abide by the Forum Rules. IP addresses of contributors together with dates and times of access are stored. The opinions and viewpoints expressed by contributors to The Fishy are their own and not necessarily those of The Fishy. The Fishy makes no claims that information dispersed through this forum is accurate or reliable. Also The Fishy cannot be held liable for any statements made by contributors of The Fishy.